🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 739+ reviews
Tools βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

FISKARS PowerArc Pro Scissors

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (739 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12.05
$20.08
Sale
βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

fresh without the boxAfter taxes come out to $34

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express shipment

↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

FISKARS PowerArc Pro Scissors

latest without the box
After taxes come out to $34

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Tools products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1351573

Category: Tools > Safety Gear > Safety Glasses

Original Price: $20.08 USD

Sale Price: $12.05 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8637 reviews
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb FISKARS PowerArc Pro Scissors
Outstanding quality FISKARS PowerArc Pro Scissors. You can tell this is well made.
35 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this
For the price, the FISKARS PowerArc Pro Scissors works well enough so no complaints. Arrived on time.
12 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
Overall highly happy with this FISKARS PowerArc Pro Scissors.
18 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
ideal for my needs
At first, it feels solid enough and I’m satisfied. shipment was normal.
43 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely superb
To be fair, it feels okay which is good enough.
31 people found this helpful