🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 878+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage 90s Tweety Bird Plus Size Overalls

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (878 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$55
$91.67
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

These are so fun and in magnificent condition! Size Women’s 18W/20W!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt dispatch
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage 90s Tweety Bird Plus Size Overalls

These are so fun and in fabulous condition! Size Women’s 18W/20W!

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 528437

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Other

Original Price: $91.67 USD

Sale Price: $55 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4641 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Worth every penny
To be fair, the Vintage 90s Tweety Bird Plus Size Overalls fits my needs which is good enough. No setup issues.
42 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extremely pleased
Works fine, no issues.
12 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptionally satisfied
Honestly, the Vintage 90s Tweety Bird Plus Size Overalls fits my needs which feels reasonable.
40 people found this helpful

MW
Michelle Walker
11 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
solely what I wanted
satisfactory control on this Vintage 90s Tweety Bird Plus Size Overalls.
28 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee
3 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
extremely happy
the Vintage 90s Tweety Bird Plus Size Overalls works fine so it’s acceptable.
9 people found this helpful